Teaching the art of thinking

See how legal reasoning grows

Tark is an AI-guided Socratic reasoning tool for Indian law colleges. Students do not just receive answers; they build reasoning profiles through cases, viva prompts, and counterfactual questions.

Try a questionContact us
AI Grand Challenge 2026 Public Vote WinnerHindi-first architecture22 Indian languages planned
Tark student dashboard with courses and reasoning profile
Product surface

A course home that feels like a serious law journal, alive.

Each course contains reasoning sessions, viva unlocks, and counterfactuals. The interface stays quiet until it has something meaningful to show.

International Commercial Dispute Resolution

Mixed International / ICC   Enrolled 7/6/2026

1 topic

Dispute resCross-border contract dispute — does ICC arbitration apply?4 sessions

VivaViva ->

CounterfactualWhat if? ->

Continue ->

Contracts — Comparative Private Law

Mixed Comparative (Common / Civil)   Enrolled 7/6/2026

1 topic

ReasoningEnforceability of a contract modification — common law vs civil law1 session

VivaComplete a Socratic session to unlock

CounterfactualComplete a Socratic session to unlock

Continue ->
Your reasoning profile

Gaps become teachable evidence.

Across five sessions, Tark maps foundational, proficient, and advanced reasoning moves so faculty can see what the class actually needs next.

Focus area

Issue identification & analytical thinking

Spotting all legal questions before diving into analysis came up 8 times across sessions. Tark will probe this next.

Evidence-based reasoning

Grounding every claim in a material fact.
Foundational

Counterfactual analysis

Testing the rule by changing one fact.
Proficient
Tark reasoning profile screenshot
How Tark works

A tutor that asks the next useful question.

Tark tracks the exchange as a reasoning object: student turns, Tark turns, resolved gaps, scaffolding, and direct instruction when needed.

01 / CASE

Start with facts

The student begins from a case, source, or faculty-created scenario.

02 / QUESTION

Reason aloud

Tark asks Socratic prompts that expose the next missing link.

03 / PROFILE

Diagnose gaps

The session becomes evidence of learning, not a one-off chat transcript.

Comparison

The same case. Three different outcomes.

Reading alone

✓Read the case

✓Highlight key facts

xHit a confusing ratio and memorise

Generic AI

✓Ask for a summary

?Get changing explanations

...No structure retained

Tark

?Tark asks a question

✓Gap identified and resolved

✓Reasoning tree saved

For classrooms

Student practice. Faculty diagnosis.

The same session serves two people: the student learning how to reason, and the teacher seeing where the cohort lost the thread.

Session replay

Today

ConceptOffer and acceptance

TRIM✓ Issue · ✓ Move · x Gap · ✓ Resolution

Cohort diagnosis

14 sessions analysed

82%Evidence-based reasoning gap

68%Issue spotting gap

Social proof

Reasoning becomes visible.

“Tark made me realise I was reciting, not reasoning.”
Priya N. / Year 2
“The replay showed exactly where I lost the thread.”
Arjun M. / Year 1
“It teaches law the way Socratic method was meant to work.”
Prof. R. Sharma